|
"To investigate
truth; critically verify fact; to reach conclusions by means of the
best methods at command, untrammeled by external fear or favor, to
communicate this truth to the student: this is precisely the aim and
object of the university. To aim a blow at any one of these
operations is to deal a vital wound to the university itself"
John Dewey, Co-founder
AAUP
News from the 2008 Summer
Institute: Your AAUP chapter is held in high regard by faculty, and even
by administrators, at other institutions. The developing
relationship between UA faculty and administration remains a subject of
close attention and great interest to the entire academic community of
the U.S.
From
the May 2009 Akron-AAUP Newsletter
"...University
of Akron trustees have created yet another new vice president position, at a
cost of $142,000...(Scott) Borgemenke's broad job description calls for
him to develop 'innovative solutions to challenging problems' in budgeting and
financing. Borgemenke is commuting from his home in Dublin, a Columbus suburb."
"...Simultaneous
with the President’s $85,000 bonus, the new $142,000 VP position, the
$25,000-plus-expenses consultant, and so on, the administration has asked all
departments to plan to cut 10% from their operating budgets. Many departments
have no fat to cut, and so any budget cuts will negatively impact their
missions. "
"...While
Akron-AAUP can understand the need for budget cuts if state funding is severely
reduced, we would expect such cuts to be shared by the administration. But the
administration’s recent spending habits seem to indicate that there is plenty of
money available for their priorities. This summer, economist Rudy
Fichtenbaum of Wright State
University will once again go over the university’s audited financial statements
with a fine tooth comb, to analyze exactly where all the money is going. Rudy
performed this service for us during negotiations for our last contract, and it
was very revealing. We will publicize the results of this investigation in the
Fall."
Read the entire issue
here.
UA in
the News: FYI
University of Akron Hires Longtime GOP Consultant
Akron Beacon Journal
4/15/2009
"University of Akron trustees have
hired a longtime Republican consultant to fill a newly
created position: associate vice president of strategy and
finance.
Scott Borgemenke, 43, was named to the
new post March 25 at a salary of $142,000. He started his
new job March 30."
Read the entire article
at Ohio.com, the Akron Beacon Journal web site,
here.
Clueless on Campus: a UA lesson in how not to win enough friends at the
Statehouse
Akron Beacon Journal
4/17/2009
"...Ohio
already has many university officials with six-figure salaries, not to mention
the nation's highest paid university president, Gordon Gee at Ohio State, at
more than $800,000 a year..."
Read the entire article at Ohio.com, the Akron Beacon Journal web
site,
here.
UA Pact Costing $25,000 Unusual
in State: Cleveland State Says Consultant Not Needed
Akron Beacon Journal
4/11/2009
"The University of Akron is paying a
consultant $25,000 a year to improve the executive and
leadership skills of President Luis Proenza and other top
managers.
Frank T. Grosser of FTGExecutive Group
Inc. in Deerfield, Ill., provides customized coaching under
the terms of an agreement that might be the only one of its
kind among state universities in Ohio.
The agreement was first signed in April
2004 and has been renewed yearly."
Read the entire article at Ohio.com, the Akron Beacon Journal web
site,
here.
Akron-AAUP
Election Results:
Professor
Walter Hixson
has been elected to the office of Chapter President. Professor
Karen Lahey
has been elected to the office of Chapter Vice-President. Prior to the
election they each provided a candidate statement, both of which are still
available here.
Congratulations to
Walter and Karen; and thanks to Jennifer Holz and Pat Parr for their selfless
service in these positions for the last two years. Well done!
From
the Current Newsletter:
President Proenza Receives $85,000 “Performance Award” (not “bonus”):
In
case you missed the story over Spring Break (Akron Beacon Journal, 3/14/09),
University of Akron trustees have rewarded President Proenza with $85,000 in
“performance payments” that brought his current compensation to $535,000.
Trustee President Philip Kaufmann said he preferred to call the awards
''performance payments'' instead of bonuses, as the latter sounds more
''willy-nilly, while these are part of the contract.''
More...
Akron-AAUP’s lawyer is “Ohio Super Lawyer”:
We
thought our members might like to know that our own lawyer, Eben “Sandy” McNair,
has been on the list of “Ohio Super Lawyers” every year since 2004, one year
after the start of this prestigious list. The objective of the Super Lawyers
selection process is to create a credible, comprehensive and diverse listing of
outstanding attorneys that can be used as a resource to assist attorneys and
consumers in the search for legal counsel. No other legal publisher goes through
the unique multi-step process that Super Lawyers employs to find evidence of
peer recognition and professional achievement. We already knew Sandy was the
best; it is gratifying to see that he is nationally recognized. For more
information on the list:
http://www.superlawyers.com/index.html
Read the entire issue
here.
Browse our back issues
here.
From
the February Newsletter:
Faculty
Development Grants via ITL:
We want
to remind faculty that as a result of the settlement of the grievance over
delayed salary implementation, the university administration created a fund
for faculty to support improvements in teaching and learning. Last year
faculty hired as of 2006 could receive a $100 grant for teaching related
materials. From January 2009 until December 15, 2009, all
bargaining unit faculty (even those just hired this year) will be eligible
to apply for grants of up to $400 from the remaining funds. There is
still a pool of money to be distributed. People who have already received a
grant need to wait one year before re-applying. Dr. Helen Qammar, the
Director of ITL, notes that faculty from the same department can combine
their $400 awards as long as there is relevant rationale. She suggests that
it is helpful if they write the benefits to the teaching mission and/or
students in their rationale. They should not present reasons that describe
improving research capabilities, as the grant is to support teaching and
learning.
This is
your money, so we encourage you to apply for eligible support. The remaining
funds will be distributed in the order in which proposals are received. To read
the guidelines and get the application form, see
here
and then send your
application to Dr. Qammar.
Akron-AAUP
Challenges Council of Deans Scheduling Policy:
From the February Newsletter
The Akron-AAUP is notifying the university administration that it believes that
the proposed unilateral changes in scheduling in the new Council of Deans policy
violate the contract, the university rules, and possibly state law. Therefore,
we have asked to negotiate over this proposed policy, as is our right. Over and
above the implications for the contract, the proposed changes can have
unintended consequences and a deleterious effect on students' timely completion
of their degree programs. With so much at stake, a quick rush to change such a
deeply embedded and interconnected process as class scheduling should be done
carefully and in consultation with the faculty.
On the faculty side of governance issues, the sooner faculty inform the union
executive committee about violations of shared governance, the sooner we can
formulate a plan and take actions to rectify situations. We urge each
faculty member to be vigilant, and to keep in mind that Akron-AAUP is always
ready to hear your voice.
The Administrative Role in
RTP Guidelines Revision:
This is a matter for your
undivided attention. When the administration and the Akron-AAUP finally agreed
on the collective bargaining contract, the general procedures for Retention,
Tenure and Promotion were legally set out in Article 13. The Provost's office,
under Provost Hickey, had asked for and received revisions of RTP guidelines
from departments around campus prior to contract ratification. To complete
contract implementation on this issue, each department must review the RTP
guidelines they now have in place, and make any modifications necessary to
comply with the contract. Faculty need to ensure that the guidelines do not
contradict the language in the contract. This is a fairly straightforward and
simple matter that will likely not entail substantial changes to existing
guidelines.
Nonetheless, there have been
concerns raised from faculty across the campus that the administration at
different levels has been mandating substantive changes in departmental RTP
guidelines as a condition of post-contract approval. If so, it is the position
of Akron-AAUP that faculty should resist this and contact the Akron-AAUP
Executive Committee to share the particulars. Akron-AAUP would remind faculty
that the contract is specific on this matter, and states that writing RTP
guidelines, and making revisions to them, is a faculty-driven process (see
Article 13, Sections 3 D-G).
While the administration may make suggestions to faculty about what it believes
would be improvements in the guidelines, faculty are under no obligation to
accept those suggestions. The administration and the faculty have a
right to expect sensible changes to RTP guidelines to bring them in line with
contract language - period. Substantive requirements for RTP are a matter for
the faculty in each discipline to decide according to the contract.
If anyone other than departmental
faculty, at any administrative level, attempts to mandate substantive changes in
guidelines as a condition for approval of your RTP revisions, the Akron-AAUP
believes that they are violating the contract and overstepping their bounds.
Administrators may make suggestions - even substantial ones, but they cannot
mandate them. Further, we ask you to notify your departmental liaison of
any such mandated changes, if you receive them in your department. Liaisons
should then contact any Chapter officer with details.
From the January 2009 Newsletter
A Note From AAUP General
Secretary Gary Rhoades
Read more here
The dramatic downturn in the national economy is leading college and
university administrations to reorganize and eliminate academic programs in the
name of increased “efficiency,” often with little semblance of shared
governance. There are good empirical reasons to doubt the material benefits
and savings of such efforts. Moreover, the condition of the economy is
leading some administrators to edge toward invoking some variation of financial
exigency.
There are good empirical
reasons to be skeptical about most such claims. We can anticipate layoffs,
particularly of contingent faculty, with too little consideration of
alternatives and too little adherence to layoff language in handbooks and
contracts. There are good empirical reasons to uphold and expand the due process
right of contingent faculty. Our colleagues in collective bargaining settings
can anticipate administrations wanting to renegotiate compensation and other
provisions. There are good empirical reasons to mobilize against such efforts.
The inquiries are already flowing into our national office—in the past few
months, the flow has increased noticeably over the thousands of inquiries that
come in a typical year.
This is not the first time
in our history that administrators have used hard times as a pretext and
opportunity to call for increased managerial “flexibility” to make “tough
choices.” This is not the first time in our history that administrators and
policy makers have claimed that we cannot afford to engage in shared governance,
to maintain a wide range of academic programs, to increase the number of
tenure-track faculty and the security of faculty in contingent positions, and
even to maintain tenure. And this is not the first time that they have been
wrong.
A study by Peter Eckel of the American Council on Education demonstrates that
these exercises are often driven more by a political “action rationality” of
simply doing something rather than by “decision rationality” focused on
optimizing cost savings and quality; they rarely meet the goals of saving money,
improving quality, or streamlining focus.
We urge
you to be healthily skeptical about administrators’ claims and to exercise the
leadership that is critical to the future of our colleges and universities. We
offer resources to support you in those efforts as you face administrative
proposals in a number of areas.
Victory on Behalf of
South African Scholar
from
AAUP Online news room
On
Monday, December 8, a federal district judge
in Massachusetts handed the AAUP a victory
in its litigation on behalf of South African
scholar and human rights official Adam Habib.
Professor Habib, who holds a Ph.D. from
CUNY, was invited to the United States in
October 2006 to address audiences at
Columbia University and the World Bank,
among others. On his way in to the country,
however, he was stopped at JFK airport and
interrogated before finally being sent back
to South Africa. His visa, along with those
of his wife and two young children, were
subsequently revoked; he subsequently
applied for a new visa to enable him to
fulfill a speaking engagement with the
American Sociological Association.
After the
government failed to act on his visa
application, the AAUP filed suit in
September 2007, along with the American
Sociological Association, the American-Arab
Anti-Discrimination Committee, the Boston
Coalition for Palestinian Rights, and
Professor Habib himself, all represented by
the ACLU. The lawsuit argued that Professor
Habib’s exclusion from this country without
explanation violated the First Amendment
rights of the plaintiffs and their members,
and asked that his visa be processed
immediately. One month later, the American
consul in South Africa sent Professor Habib
a letter informing him that he was
inadmissible under a section of the USA
Patriot Act that empowers the government to
exclude an alien who has “engaged in
terrorism.” The government provided no
evidence supporting its conclusion. The
government then asked the court to dismiss
the lawsuit, arguing that courts do not have
the authority to review consular visa
denials, even where the First Amendment
rights of U.S. citizens and residents are
involved.
In its
decision yesterday, the judge roundly
rejected the government’s argument that
courts are prohibited from reviewing visa
denial decisions where Americans’ First
Amendment rights are implicated. As the
judge noted, courts have, at a minimum, the
power to determine whether a visa was denied
“on the basis of a facially legitimate and
bona fide reason.” The judge also rebuffed
the government’s argument that where no
reason at all is offered for a visa denial,
no review is permitted. “The incentive
[that the government’s] proposed
interpretation would give the government
would be perverse: better to give no reason
for a denial so that it would be
unreviewable than to give a reason and be
second-guessed by a court.” The court
therefore denied the government’s motion to
dismiss the case.
The AAUP and
its fellow plaintiffs had also moved for
summary judgment; the court stayed that
motion so that both parties can engage in
factual discovery before trial. Please stay
tuned for further developments in this
important case. For additional information,
see the
AAUP's amicus briefs; in addition, see
the ACLU’s
webpage on ideological exclusion.
Key Win For Scholar Kept Out of the U.S.
from
Inside Higher Ed online
Judge George A. O’Toole Jr. ruled that the First
Amendment requires the government to provide a valid
and substantiated reason for barring Habib from the
United States, when there are groups here that want
to meet with him. The decision said that “the
government has not given a reason for the denial,”
and that simply stating that he is banned because he
has “engaged in terrorist activities” — without
specifying them in a credible way — isn’t good
enough.
Habib is a leading sociologist
in South Africa and is currently deputy vice
chancellor of research, innovation and advancement
at the University of Johannesburg. He has been
denied visas that would have been needed for him to
accept
invitations to speak at the annual meeting of the
American Sociological Association and to other
groups.
Read the entire article at Inside Higher Ed
online.
Back to Top of
Page
From the December Issue of the Akron-AAUP Newsletter
Faculty
Background Checks:
The Campus Safety committee, with an Akron-AAUP
representative, has been looking at various ways of making the UA campus safer.
While most of the ideas being considered are reasonable and constructive, there
are concerns. The University is proposing to conduct criminal, financial,
reference, and other background checks on every new faculty and staff hire.
This would be regardless of their duties or responsibilities, and whether any of
these are sensitive. The Akron-AAUP has at least two thoughts on this, and we’d
like to know yours as well....More here.
Third Year of
Enrollment Bonus for Bargaining Unit Faculty:
About 700 faculty in the Akron-AAUP collective bargaining
unit should receive an enrollment bonus check for $750 (minus the necessary
deductions) next Spring in their April paycheck...This bonus
alone represents nearly half a million dollars that Akron-AAUP’s negotiating
team guaranteed for our faculty. We hope that some of you who have yet to join
the Akron-AAUP will use this opportunity to take that modest, extra step in
supporting our chapter’s efforts.
More here.
From the November Issue of the Akron-AAUP Newsletter
University of Akron VP on Part Time Faculty:
As reported in
Inside Higher Ed, UA's own
A. G. Monaco, VP for Human Resources, made quite a splash at the recent College
and University Professional Association - Human Resources (CUPA-HR) annual
conference. In an article titled Call to Arms for Adjuncts...From an
Administrator (10/14/08), Monaco is quoted as saying that universities, in
effect, immorally take advantage of their adjunct or part-time faculty, possibly
at their peril. According to Monaco, the abuse (low wages, no benefits,
etc.) could lead adjunct or part-time faculty to unionize, which he says would
be quite bad. While Monaco seems to be encouraging universities to do the right
thing, he also is quoted as saying that he knows how to "brutalize" part-time
faculty if asked to do so.
While Ohio's collective bargaining statute (ORC 4117) does not
permit graduate assistants or part-time faculty to seek collective bargaining
under that statute, Monaco's comments do suggest some action. Now that he is
the VP for Human Resources, part-time faculty might consider asking the
university to provide some of the pay and benefits parity, with full-time
faculty, that Monaco suggests is only fair. With no contractual obligations to
stop him, it should be clear sailing for Monaco to do what he says is the
morally right thing.
Read the entire
November issue of the newsletter here.
Back to Top of
Page
AAUP In
Cincinnati: A Strike is Avoided and Tenure Protected
An Example of the
Value of Faculty Resolve and Preparedness
From the AAUP
Online Newsletter
AAUP members’ preparedness and
resolve have once again saved the day, averting a strike and
protecting tenure. This October, the 177 members of the
Cincinnati State Technical and Community
College chapter of the AAUP won their contract campaign
when an imminent strike forced the administration back to the
bargaining table. The
AAUP’s Collective Bargaining Congress
had pledged money from its emergency fund to help chapter
members who might face financial hardship during an extended
walkout, when the administration, faced with the prospect of a
strike right at the end of the college’s early fall term,
reluctantly returned to the bargaining table. Backed by a united
faculty and the CBC, the chapter’s bargaining team successfully
defeated a proposal to limit tenure and made substantial contractual
gains.
The chapter’s contract expired on
September 1, shortly after the two parties reached an impasse over
the administration’s continued delay of progress towards workload
and salary agreements. At issue was the administration’s proposal to
effectively end the future of tenure at the college by making all
new faculty positions non-tenure-track, with the exception of the
first professor hired for any new program, a move to weaken faculty
governance and upend academic freedom. The administration also
refused to consider the union’s proposed salary increase.
When a fact-finder’s contract
proposal still threatened the existence of tenure at the college,
the Cincinnati State AAUP members rejected it and voted on October
15 to strike beginning October 27 if a contract settlement was not
reached by then. The strike plans brought the administration back to
the table, and after another week of intense negotiations, the two
sides reached a tentative agreement late on the night of Friday,
October 24. Union members ratified the contract the next day by an
overwhelming majority. The contract includes a ten percent pay
increase over three years, a one-time lump sum payment to all
members, and a reduction in workload. More significantly, the
administration agreed to drop its proposal to limit tenure, proving
once again that collective bargaining is an effective tool for
preserving and protecting academic freedom and tenure.
Back to Top of
Page
AAUP Legislative
Alert: Border Searches of Electronic Materials
From The AAUP Online Member Newsletter,
October 14, 2008
By Cary Nelson, President, AAUP National and Nicole Byrd, AAUP Government Relations Associate
"...In July
2008, the Department of Homeland Security revealed that its internal
policies no longer require any suspicion of illegal activity to
search and seize travelers’ materials. While privacy issues are
everyone’s concern, and all citizens should actively defend their
civil liberties, faculty members have particular areas of concern
about this policy due to their research and collaboration with
colleagues around the world..."
Read the entire article
here.
Back to Top of
Page
RTP Guidelines: Grievance Filed
Akron-AAUP filed a grievance against the administration this
summer because of the administration’s denial of the Philosophy
department faculty’s RTP guidelines. The contract states that RTP
guidelines should be “faculty driven."
We encourage other departmental faculty, who may receive similar
rejections, to contact the Akron-AAUP and not to acquiesce to
unreasonable limitations on faculty rights.
More on this here.
Back to Top of
Page
A More Complete Assessment of UA’s
Accreditation Report
For a printable
copy of this item click
here.
In the August
12 Email Digest, the UA administration shared the results of the
final report issued by the review team.
Akron-AAUP would like to give you a fuller picture of the HLC’s
concerns and recommendations.
More
here.
Back to Top of
Page
Parking Issue
Administration Fails at Shared Governance Opportunity
…Again
The Akron-AAUP has
filed a grievance over the recent and unilateral changes made to
parking on campus.
Starting September 15, the university administration made a
unilateral change to the availability of parking spaces in some
of the parking decks, setting aside more spaces for residential
students in prime locations (e.g. the 4th floor of the
Exchange Parking Deck) while forcing faculty, staff, and commuter
students into outlying lots (e.g. the East Deck near Route 8). This
decision bypassed earlier decisions from the existing shared
governance parking committees and negating some of their
prior and agreed upon policies on campus parking. The report of
their earlier decisions has, not surprisingly, been removed from the
university web site. We do, however, have copies of their
recommendations posted
here.
Our understanding, documented in emails to and from Jim Stafford of
Parking Services, is that an impromptu committee of administrators
decided to bypass the joint decisions arrived at by the parking
committees, in response to some complaints from some residential
students and their families about the lack of more nearby
residential parking spaces. The basis for doing so seems to have
been to privilege the needs and concerns of one group over those of
commuter students, staff and faculty, for whom the availability and
turnover of parking spaces is critical both to their safety and to
their presence on campus at reasonable times. Parking committees had
met and considered all factors before deciding on a parking plan for
this Fall semester only to be overriden by the administration.
The larger issue
here is the continued refusal of the university administration to
acknowledge existing and mutually-agreed-upon shared governance
mechanisms in order to place the university's revenue generating
priorities ahead of those of 20,000-plus commuters, faculty and
staff. We'll remind faculty that an underlying cause of our
unionization was precisely this sort of deliberate failures in
shared governance.
If you are puzzled
or concerned about these decisions, you could contact John Case, who
chaired the original Parking Task Force, and Jim Stafford, the head
of Parking Services. Otherwise follow along on the process of the
grievance.
Back to Top of
Page
An Award for Akron-AAUP
At the June Meeting of the Assembly of State Conferences your
Akron-AAUP received a national award for Outstanding Chapter
Website. We shared this honor with colleagues at the
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. This is truly a
group effort, so congratulations to all!
Of course, this means it's time for cleanup and extensive
revisions. Your web team will gladly receive suggestions as well as
all offers of help.
UA Faculty
at the 2008 AUUP Summer Institute in Kingston, RI
Last year the chapter funded three faculty members to go to Reno,
Nevada for three days of intensive training and focused workshops at
the annual AAUP Summer Institute. This year Akron-AAUP was well
represented again with 8 members of the faculty in attendance at The
University of Rhode Island at Kingston. In addition to attending
some informative sessions on the history of AAUP,
government relations, trends in faculty status, etc., your
colleagues participated in rigorous training workshops on Contract
Negotiations and Grievance Procedures.
Professors Aby and Witt lead a workshop on Communications and
Public Relations Campaigns. Professor Lyons lead a workshop on
Conflict Resolution.
Though training sessions can be rigorous the Institute is by no
means 'all work and no play.' Friday evening featured an
old-fashioned New England clam bake. Saturday evening
presented the option of a ferry ride to Newport for a little touring
and dinner, or a bus tour of Newport mansions.

Robbie, our Bake Master

Newport, Rhode Island
The Summer Institute is educational,
inspirational and is a great opportunity to learn from and share
experience with issues common to faculty across the country. We
recommend the Summer Institute to all.
By the way, your AAUP chapter is held in
high regard by faculty, and even by administrators, at other
institutions. The developing relationship between UA faculty
and administration remains a subject of close attention and great
interest to the entire academic community of the U.S. We find
this gratifying, indeed.
And, From the 2007
Institute: Academic Freedom
Last year's Institute opened with a session on
"Academic Freedom and the First Amendment" presented by Rachel
Levinson, Senior Counsel for the National AAUP. With Rachel's
kind permission we post for your perusal a copy of the notes
distributed to all who attended. You can get a copy
here. It's worth a
look.
Back to Top of
Page
The Market Salary Adjustment
Process
A number of departments are making market based
salary adjustments as called for in the collective bargaining
agreement. Here are links to three PDF documents which faculty in
those departments may find useful.
1)
An Overview of The 2006-07 Market Salary Adjustment Process
2) Instructions for Market Compression Adjustments Effective 2006
3)
Contract Article 16, Section 9 "Market Adjustment"
Administrators with questions should contact Chand Midha at
cmidha@uakron.edu.
Bargaining unit faculty with questions should contact Mike Cheung at
cheung@uakron.edu.
Back to Top of
Page
AAUP-KSU Reaches
Tentative Agreement
Colleagues at Kent State University
report that the KSU chapter of AAUP has reached a tentative
agreement with administration on the terms of a new contract which,
if approved, will extend through August 2011. The agreement,
reached just hours before a faculty strike vote was to be taken,
includes: - a more than 13.5% salary
increase over the life of the contract
-
domestic partner benefits
- improvements in
dental coverage - a freeze on faculty
contributions to health care coverage until 2010
The faculty rejected a previous university offer of a one year contract
extension. Negotiations began May 29 and concluded August 1.
Once Kent's CBA is approved we'll post it
here for interested parties to review.
For details, consult the AAUP-KSU web site
here.
Back to Top of
Page |
Information for New Faculty
Here.
Faculty Development Grants
From ITL: Here.
Current Contract Implementation Issues
at UA:
RTP
Guidelines
Chair Review Guidelines (updated
February 20, 2009)
Merit Review Guidelines
These Are
Links to Approved Guidelines, Important Notes to
Faculty, Grievance resolutions, etc.
On This
Page- Current
Issues Affecting Faculty:
Key
Win for Scholar Kept Out of the U.S.
From the Current and Recent Newsletters:
-Faculty Background
Checks;
-Enrollment Bonus;
-UA's VP Comments on Contingent Faculty
A Strike
is Avoided and Tenure is Protected: AAUP in Cincinnati
Legislative Alert: Border Searches of Electronic Media
Another Grievance is Filed
The Accreditation Report:
A
More Complete Assessment
Another Example of a Failed Shared Governance Opportunity
An Award for Akron-AAUP
AAUP 2008 Summer Institute
Market Salary Adjustment
Procedures
KSU-AAUP Reaches Tentative Agreement
Items
of Interest:
Do You Need Representation
Now?
Akron-AAUP's Constitution
Read The Contract Here
Academic
Freedom and The First Amendment
|