![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Endorsements from Colleagues |
||
from Rudy Fichtenbaum, Chief Negotiator, Wright State University AAUP
Dear University of Akron Colleagues:
I have looked over the highlights of your contract and I think it is fantastic. I think you have negotiated what will turnout to be one of the best economic packages in the state over the next 4 years. Given that the administration and trustees at Akron bargained very hard over this contract, it is clear that your first contract is a big success. You have helped to preserve faculty governance and have fought off virtually all of the proposals that would have eroded the faculty role at Akron. Congratulations to the leadership of AAUP on your campus, to your negotiating team, and to your executive committee who have spent countless hours on behalf of the faculty. And congratulations to all of the faculty members who supported the efforts of your leadership making this great victory possible. With regards, Rudy Fichtenbaum - WSU-AAUP from Rodger Govea, Cleveland State UniversityI am thrilled to hear that you have reached a tentative
agreement on your first contract. For a long time, everything seemed so
difficult. Good Grievance Procedure - First, and most important, you have a good grievance procedure, cemented into place by the provision for binding arbitration. In my experience, this provision is critical to first contracts. Like all other universities without labor contracts, U of Akron was a place where there was no check on arbitrary administrative decisions. Any faculty deliberations on a complaint were merely recommendations, which could be completely ignored by the administration. Essentially, you complained about the administration’s action, and pleaded your case to the very entity that had created the complaint. Binding Arbitration - Binding arbitration completely changes that arrangement. If the administration stonewalls you on a grievance, the matter can be taken to a neutral third party who will decide on the merits of the case. You will get a decision that has the force of law. In essence, you have the mechanism that will make the contract an enforceable document. Solid Salary Settlement - Second, you have a good, solid salary settlement. The basic across-the-board component is in line with other universities (it’s what we got at Cleveland State this year), and has a provision for offsetting health care increases (which we don’t have). It will take a few more negotiations before you begin to rectify many of the inequities that have built up over time, but you have a good, solid foundation for future negotiations. Governance - Third,
you got governance. When the Board of Trustees took governance away, they
proved that you never really had it in the first place. Now you have it, and in
a legally-binding document. I could go on, but it all leads to the same
conclusion -- that your negotiating team has done a tremendous job of producing
a solid contract. You should thank them profusely, and then ratify the contract
they have produced. |
News:The Fair Share Fee referendum has passed.
|
|
|
Akron-AAUP © 2007 | All Rights Reserved |
|
Template by |